Marker's Notes
This is a valuable and interesting review, which could be improved with better coverage of literature and correct format for an academic literature review. While you specified the research aim, purpose, and major themes, the association between the aim and themes were not clearly explained, and it was difficult for a reader to comprehend how you aim could be achieved by reviewing literature on those themes. You summarised several frameworks or theories for defining and grouping the 21st century skills and competencies, but you could have gone further to critically compare and evaluate these frameworks, and identify the key issues and debates. Lack of criticalness and in-depth analysis in your review was likely caused by limited coverage and content of literature. A formal academic literature review should cover a large number of peer-reviewed references, e.g. the articles from the journals and conferences with high impact factors. It was admirable for you to link the review with your own teaching practice, but the content of a literature review including opinions and questions should be based on the references you studied. The Maori aspects in relation to your review were discussed. Your conclusion was convincing and well-written. Total: 63%
0 Comments
|
AuthorCurrently enrolled in the Mindlab Postgraduate Course and am looking at ways to document what I learn. Archives
July 2016
Categories
All
|